Bjorn, the page in question [[Jewish ethnocentrism]] was the page Stormfront and the other white-supremacist websites were discussing in terms of creating user accounts to have the vote changed. It was therefore a sensitive page, with arguably anti-Semitic content and, also arguably, a POV title. There was a vote 48-13 to delete it. You were one of those wanting to keep it. It was therefore deleted, entirely properly. Another editor took it through a vote to undelete it. The "keep delete" vote was decisive. There were only two votes to keep, one from the editor who proposed it at VfU, and one from you as User:Palestine-info. And yet a few days later, an admin took it upon himself to recreate it; at first just as a redirect to another article containing some of the same anti-Semitic content, but he later started to rewrite it; and then he hampered all attempts by other admins to delete it again. It isn't right that someone should do this just days after two solid votes; otherwise there's no point in having the votes. And the planned interference of Stormfront makes the issue more sensitive than it would otherwise be.
Sarah
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 01:02:26 +0100, BJörn Lindqvist bjourne@gmail.com wrote:
I do think it is OK for someone to create an article with the same name as a previously deleted one as long as the new article isn't more or less a copy of the deleted one.