The bigger problem are the allegations mentioned in the article about use of foundation funds. Three specific claims are made: -Jimbo tried to expense a $300+ bottle of wine -Jimbo tried to expense a massage parlor visit -Wikimedia foundation took away Jimbo's credit card.
Obviously, of it any of that were true, it would be super bad, and nothing can be done but watch it play out.
But, far more likely, if it's false, the foundation needs to find out that it's false, and then get that word out ASAP. I haven't seen them say it's not true. I haven't looked hard, but then-- nobody else out there is looking hard either. If I haven't seen "the facts" on the issue, neither has almost everyone else.
If it's true, the foundation clearly knows - they can't have missed the fact that they took away his credit card, can they? If it's not true, it would be good if the foundation said so. If it is true, then clearly they decided at the time that (probably for evangelical/PR reasons) it was worth keeping him involved, and I'm inclined to trust them on that decision - now that it's been made public, however, that changes things. If they can't deny it, they probably do need to do something...