Erik Moeller wrote:
That's fair enough. I will add the appropriate disclaimers to all the pages about Christianity, which I consider potentially dangerous to children. Of course I will do so in an NPOV way. ;-)
Well, that would be fine, I think. If there was a meta data content advisory field, it probably would be best to flag these articles as being "About Religion; About Christianity".
Can you see where this is going? Standards for what is and isn't appropriate for children or adults vary so greatly that any offensiveness disclaimer is bound to be either POV (because we only add it to some pages) or useless (because we add it to all pages)
Well, I don't see why that has to be true, if we are thoughtful with how we implement content advisory meta data.
It's pretty clear to me that some topics, [[felching]] comes to mind, can be fairly uncontroversially described as 'possibly mature content; sexuality'. That's true even though people do differ widely as to their tolerance for such content.
--Jimbo