-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Delirium wrote:
Well, that's why I think we *should* have review processes of some sort. Then if a reader sees an unreviewed article, they are indeed in the situation you describe. But if a reader sees an article that has been reviewed as at least "pretty good" by people who know something about the field, then they can rest assured that nothing obvious is wrong about it. For what it's worth, I do think we should have a different process of reviewing than good/featured, but that's been talked about at length before.
(snip) -Mark
Yeah but people still wouldn't know if the article had changed since it was deemed 'pretty good'.
Cynical