Good question. This was described as a "hit list". It certainly was a list of people who were carrying out a legitimate (if wrong-headed) consensus. I suppose it could have been the basis for a legitimate request for reconsideration of the decision. We do need to consider the question of how we deal with users who have strong Islamist points of view.
Fred
On May 30, 2006, at 3:26 PM, The Cunctator wrote:
Making a list of people who took an action you disagree with shouldn't be grounds for blocking, though.