On 12/11/05, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/11/05, Anthony DiPierro wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
Hmm, I'd say an article in the Boston Globe means there are certainly verifiable sources which can be used to create an article on Yoism. Verifiability may have been one of the reasons you gave for the nomination, but it doesn't seem to be a valid one.
Anthony
Problem is the boston article provides minimal info.
-- geni
That's only a problem if you're one of those people that insists that all articles be long. Let's see:
-----
[[Yoism]] is a movement started by [[Dan Kriegman]] which deals with topics such as environmentalism, experientially proven beliefs, and social activism. The group formed a non-profit corporation, '''Yo, Inc.''', in December of 2002 [http://corp.sec.state.ma.us/corp/corpsearch/CorpSearchSummary.asp?ReadFromDB...] which was recognized as a public charity by the United States [[Internal Revenue Service]].
==External links== *http://www.yoism.org/
==References== *Taking Yo off the streets and into church, Boston Globe, Junuary 11, 2004
-----
This is just a quick article I came up with without knowing anything at all about Yoism. I'm sure others who know more about it could come up with a lot more, all completely verifiable by pretty much any standard (government documents, newspapers, etc). But I'm not one of those people who thinks an article has to be long in order to be useful.
Anyway, I see now the article has been redirected to [[Open source religion]]. There was no need for an AFD to do that.
Anthony