His actions on the VfD page and the pages listed there can only be considered vandalism. Repeated deletions of VfD headers, and repeated deletions of pages listed on the VfD page is vandalism. Non-consensus mass moving of pages is vandalism. Repeated deletions of other people's discussions is vandalism.
RickK
Angela beesley@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 22:03:28 -0700 (PDT), Rick wrote:
I have blocked Netoholic for 24 hours. I am sure somebody will run slavering to the Special pages in order to unblock him as soon as they see this, but I'll tell you why I have blocked him.
I'd unblocked him before you sent this. And it didn't involve running or slavering.
Netoholic, since his first few days on Wikipedia, has been nothing but disruptive.
I don't think that is a fair summary. Netoholic is not a troll acting in bad faith. He believes he is improving the VfD system. In my opinion, he's going about that the wrong way, but his edits can not be classed as purely disruptive.
Angela. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Y! Messenger - Communicate in real time. Download now.