Andrew Gray wrote:
On 31/01/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
It has been discovered that the new system of cascading protection (which protects any element transcluded in a page protected with the cascade bit turned on) allows us to transclude and thus protect a non-existent article.
If that was deliberate, I would have called it a surpassingly beautiful hack. But it's serendipitous. That's somehow even *better*.
So dare I ask, what's the oversight on this? I'm waiting for the first day an article is protected that has never been created, in particular.
-Jeff