On Dec 1, 2007 11:07 AM, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
On Dec 1, 2007 10:52 AM, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007 15:25:00 +0000, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
Openness will from time to time require semi private communications become public.
In this case, it was necessary to publish the email only in order to ensure that Durova was adequately humiliated. You'll excuse me, I hope, for finding that just ever so slightly distasteful.
If that was the only reason it was done I'd find it distasteful too. Justified, but distasteful. In this case the publication of the email served at least one other purpose, though. It served to bring to public light the existence of two secret mailing lists and gave us all at least a hint at the improper things which are occurring on those mailing lists.
Actually, it didn't do either, since neither list was "secret", and there is no indication that "improper things" are occurring on those mailing lists.
And, frankly, it's for that reason that some arb com members want to punish Giano.
That's not being "frank", that's just being assuming bad faith *and* being completely incorrect. Please don't mistake the former for the latter.
Humiliating people who have made a mistake isn't the problem.
Err, yes it is. And you persist.