On 5/3/07, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/4/07, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
An article would be written, but it would most certainly *not* be fully comprehensive.
Yes and no. At random [[Modularity theorem]] does not include the proof.
-- geni
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Doesn't look tremendously complete to me, either. (Though a proof seems more to me the type of thing that would go on Wikisource. That's not the same thing as a single numerical value.)