On 01/04/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
On Sun, 1 Apr 2007 16:46:33 +0200, "Andries Krugers Dagneaux" andrieskd@chello.nl wrote:
I understand that. But topic banning an editor whose edits on that topic were desribed by the arbcom as "generally responsible" and without diffs that show disruptive editing on that topic is neither fair nor does it help the encyclopedia.
Wasn't the problem here one of conflict of interest, though?
No, it's that the editors in question have been attempting to get Andries kicked off those articles for the last three years and they finally rules-lawyered it through.
This was *not* a good ArbCom decision, not at all.
- d.