Ok, I should clarify: we define the limits of knowledge that we want, and without respect to other sources of information, we attempt to fill them. It doesn't matter if there exists a beautiful, free encyclopaedia out there, if it has information that we lack, we attempt to replicate it.
I make comment this purely as an observation, not a goal.
Steve
On 5/28/06, Fred Bauder fredbaud@ctelco.net wrote:
I hope we are not that dumb. How many campsites in individual campgounds is way too much detail for us.
Fred
On May 28, 2006, at 4:46 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:
*Remember that Wikipedia is inherently egotistical - it does not accept that better sources of information can or should exist. That is, people will probably want to add everything informative that there is to know from your site, then cut off the link. To put it differently, Wikipedia wants to be the most informative site in the universe on US national parks, and will not respect the right of your site to be more informative than it.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l