In case you hadn't realised, debate had begun (ha!) to centre on the page protection, rather than the issue at hand. Perhaps a bit of discussion might ensue now? If it doesn't, then protection can be reapplied. I just don't like debating the veracity of a page's protection, rather than the page itself.
Sam
On 6/16/05, JAY JG jayjg@hotmail.com wrote:
From: Sam Korn smoddy@gmail.com
Oh for heck's sake. I have unprotected it, but if the revert war
restarts,
I shall protect again.
And thank goodness that picture of a giant yellow turd has been restored to the top of the article. It only took 9 minutes from your unprotecting it. Wikipedia was simply a laughingstock as an encyclopedia for every second that graphic and extremely important picture of a human bowel movement was missing. In addition, the bright yellow colour really peps up what might otherwise have been a dull read.
Jay.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l