Re: [WikiEN-l] New Post. It's time for the admins to explain their behavior

I think this edit

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php? title=Joe_Scarborough&diff=prev&oldid=51001676

alone is enough to justify an indefinite block. As was recently said in connection with Ward Churchill, you don't seem to be able to separate scholarship from polemic.

Fred

On May 18, 2006, at 6:22 AM, Earthhope Action Network wrote:

New Post. It's time for the admins to explain their behavior

I Maggie user:thewolfstar got blocked indefinitely for:

1.) telling RyanFriesling to wipe the snot off of his shirt, etc, while he taunted my friend Merecat. (taunting is not allowed by wiki ettiqutee policy Ryan didn't get no punishment.)

2.) for not making enough main page edits, which rule doesn't exist. And it's not true. KINDLY LOOK THIS TIME

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php? offset=&limit=50&target=Thewolfstar&title=Special% 3AContributions&namespace=0