On 4/21/07, Ron Ritzman ritzman@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/21/07, Fred Bauder fredbaud@waterwiki.info wrote:
They did not commit any offense, merely participated in debate. I'm
curious, but that is > no reason to run checkuser.
What confuses me is this, if those using the anonymous accounts to protest the Brandt unblocking were concerned about Jimbo and co taking some kind of retribution on them for their views then what good would it do to make another account? If the "God Kings" are petty enough to do that, then they would have no qualms about doing an out of process checkuser to find out who they are.
I'm curious how you came to the conclusion that the editor(s) were/was trying to hide from Jimbo. Despite what Fred said, I'd be very surprised if no one ran checkuser, after all, it can be run without generating a public log...