For example consider
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=50...
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 1:37 AM, White Cat wikipedia.kawaii.neko@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps but collaborative consensus or collaboration in general is relatively unheard of on the article in question. Feel free to glance at the talk page(s) if you like. You will see many examples of trolling, personal attacks, abusive sockpuppetry and other forms of disruption for the past many years.
Unless this issue is addressed first, it is rather pointless to discuss anything else.
- White Cat
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 1:25 AM, Peter Ansell ansell.peter@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/04/2008, White Cat wikipedia.kawaii.neko@gmail.com wrote:
Wikipedia does not pass judgement on history. We write about what is
sourced
not what is *right*.
Wikipedia does editorial work to determine a collaborative consensus for the NPOV based on external research. In a way it is passing judgement, but no more than its sources accommodate for. There is no particular reason why both sides of an argument should be represented equally, NPOV#Undue weight might be an interesting read here.
Peter
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l