On Dec 14, 2007 3:29 PM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/12/2007, Mathias Schindler mathias.schindler@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 14, 2007 8:54 AM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds like about.com II, or Scholarpedia.
With the difference of Knol being licensed under CC-BY 3.0
So I see. BIG WIN! That'll make me a fan :-)
- d.
One problem: an article there'll probably have to be viewed as a self-published source; I don't see Google claiming to exercise any editorial control. WP:V might see a few disagreements as people try to alter it to allow reliance on free, signed content.
RR
The article they display uses references. Anything wrong should draw plenty of feedback and subsequent corrections or clarifications.
Fred