On 5/30/07, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
It seems to me that the times in which a link to WR would benefit Wikipedia are extremely few at best, and involve very specific circumstances - so specific, that they could, in fact, be enumerated in very short list.
Indeed, there are at best 5-7 total 'attack sites'. So few, that they could, in fact, be enumerated in very short list.
Why not just list them at BADSITES as a "do not link list"? If the *community* agrees on an entry, hey, cool, don't link it. If not, well, the community has decided, right? Unless very small minorities on-wiki get to decide they know better than everyone else and try to policy wonk or game their way to their ends. But that would be wrong, no? ;)
Regards, Joe http://www.joeszilagyi.com