On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Chris Howie cdhowie@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Chris Howie cdhowie@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Silas Snider swsnider@gmail.com
wrote:
Interestingly, after viewing the original image, it actually looks as though the baby image is taped onto the monitor using what looks to be a strip of tape (the fuzzy line) (which would explain the image extending past the monitor)
This is possible, but it doesn't seem so to me. The strip contains what appears to be colored random noise. Not sure how you'd get those random colors from a strip of tape, unless it was really oily or something...
In addition, the image is way too sharp as compared with the surroundings, as pointed out by Mathias. If it were taped on I would expect it to be just as in (or out of) focus as the monitor itself.
-- Chris Howie http://www.chrishowie.com http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Crazycomputers
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
It doesn't appear to be a taped on image, physically placed on the screen. It looks like a pretty hacked up/weak Photoshopping, to augment the image on the screen. I've attached a zoomed in view of the image of the lower left corner of the monitor for the curious. The pixel heavy strip across the screen... I don't know that was originally, but it's clearly not physical tape on the actual monitor. It's something inside the smaller image they attempted to impose in there. This image would be a candidate for http://photoshopdisasters.blogspot.com/ if it were professionally published somewhere.
- Joe