Hi,
For a clearer idea of AAP's argument, please see:
https://mx2.arl.org/Lists/SPARC-OAForum/Message/3572.html
Thanks, George en|irc : [[GChriss]]
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 22:03:49 +0000 English Wikipedia wrote:
On 1/29/07, jkelly@fas.harvard.edu jkelly@fas.harvard.edu wrote:
Quoting David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/25/AR2007012501...
"...Dezenhall told the association's professional and scholarly publishing division, he could help -- in part by simplifying the industry's message to a few key phrases that even a busy senator could grasp. Phrases like: "Public access equals government censorship..."
They've hired Cplot?!?
Jkelly
It would explain a lot. I tend to feel that one would be rather open to a counter attack along the lines of:
montage of NASA images
"the Association of American Publishers would have you believe that this is censorship"