SV wrote:
At [[Terrorism]], he inserted a bunch of made-up and bizarre definitions of terrorism,
The diff is below - it doesnt seem to be too out of line. Its certainly not in a good style of organization for an intro, and certainly reinstating it as if he owned the place was a disruption. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Terrorism&diff=21668376&ol...
(the consensus version, as he called it)
Whatever.
the trolling continued on the talk page, with him holding forth, organizing polls, insulting people
etc. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Zephram_Stark
RFC seems to be just as "toxic" (ie. rumor mill) as IRC, so that alone isnt impressive. The charge of insulting and trolling seems quite well established though.
"This place is a joke. It's too bad, because it had possibilities before all you fucking Jews came along ..."
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AZephram_Stark&diff...
Um, yeah. That particular comment doesnt typically make friends and influence uncles.
That's about it, but it's hopefully enough.
Nice work. Send to Arbcom to formalize.
SV
__________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com