On 5/29/07, MacGyverMagic/Mgm macgyvermagic@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/29/07, Slim Virgin slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
There are some sites where practically every link will quickly lead to a serious personal attack. The idea is not to increase the readership of the site.
Name one such site other than Wikipedia Review.
And no one has given a single example of where one of
these dedicated attack sites would ever *need* to be linked to, rather than the contents described, or the link e-mailed to someone.
There's no examples of why attack sites should not be linked. Suppose you're discussing a forum post from Wikipedia Review in some Wikipedia-relevant discussion. How can you reasonably do that without linking to it?
Mgm
At least part of that site can be considered attack site (I have no idea if the Brandt's Hivemind page is still gone), but there's plenty of simple crititcs there whose posts are worth discussing. I don't see why we should ban an entire site just for part of its content.
Mgm