On 6/15/07, Steve Summit scs@eskimo.com wrote:
jayjg wrote:
On 6/15/07, Steve Summit scs@eskimo.com wrote:
Okay, but part of the trust that's involved in a tool like checkuser is *not* paying attention to (let alone revealing) stuff you accidentally notice while investigating something else.
Except when it might become relevant to the protection of the project...
I'm not going to get into a side debate about this, but there's a reason real courts distinguish between admissible and inadmissible evidence.
Wikipedia isn't a whole bunch of things, including a court of law. Not even the ArbCom.