On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Andrew Gray andrew.gray@dunelm.org.uk wrote:
2009/3/3 David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com:
By Hakon Wium Lie of Opera:
http://www.princexml.com/howcome/2009/wikipedia/infobox/
What is the likelihood of making as much as possible CSS? How to make infoboxes degrade gracefully for non-CSS browsers and IE users?
Youch, that's messy in IE7. Lovely though it may be, that 30-50% of our audience would not be happy...
On another note, wow. I hadn't realised how much stuff was in our infoboxes. The five lines of government I can understand, the two GDPs ditto, but do we really need a quick-reference for "proportion of area which is water", the Gini coefficient, or the side of the road it uses?
Probably yes, but not in a box but in a separate article. I think I saw one once, a separate article on stats for a country, but I can't remember where I saw that. When some infoboxes are longer than a small article, you know something has bloated somewhere.
I looked at United States:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States
And the number of sub-articles is mind-numbingly large. Many of those have sub-infoboxes, so maybe too much is being put in the main country infoboxes?
Here we go:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_United_States
The weather articles are similarly stats- and table-heavy.
I'm sure they are useful, but do people really use them?
Carcharoth