On 1/4/06, Alphax (Wikipedia email) alphasigmax@gmail.com wrote:
Similarly, "user has too many useless userboxes/user has < 500 article edits" could become a regular "oppose" reason at RfA... after all, if it's bad userboxes and stupid admins who are being targeted here, why not draw the conclusion that "stupid userboxes -> bad admins"?
Because once that becomes publicized, people will start removing userboxes during their RFA, and re-adding them after they are +sysoped. Looking at the content of someone's userpage will always be a lazy and inappropriate way to research whether someone is qualified to be an admin, I'm afraid.
Ryan