--- Geoffrey Thomas geoffreyerffoeg@yahoo.com wrote:
Yes. I said, "except for historical articles on the religion[, such] as one might find in a history textbook". This is just for basic content. But even though we _may_ mention religion, do we _need_ to? I'm thinking on the lines of a science-and-math-topics 'pedia - religious articles, despite their legality, wouldn't be relevant.
No, I think all subjects should be covered, unless there is considerable resistance to their subject matter. Why only cover science and math when we can cover almost everything and still get it to schools?
A split portal system. I wrote my message before I saw that possibility. It's much superior to a complete article fork.
Just, can we have a few articles forked, e.g., [[Anagram]] which contains some questionable examples?
-[[User:Geoffrey]] Thomas
I agree, it would be a good idea to fork some articles. For example, articles such as [[homosexuality]] should be written about, but not with as much, uh, detail. --LDan
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com