On 3/31/07, Phil Sandifer Snowspinner@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 31, 2007, at 3:46 PM, MacGyverMagic/Mgm wrote:
Which is exactly why only sources from the subject are not enough. People and companies are notoriously bad at determining their own notability, so to do that (and avoid uncontestable deletions of good information) you need at least one outside source to determine notability.
And that's fine(ish). But this amounts to an incontestable speedy deletion for articles of questionable notability. That's not OK.
I'm not saying such deletions are okay, I'm just countering the claim that only primary sources shouldn't be enough -- in the long run.
Mgm