David Gerard wrote:
2008/12/8 KillerChihuahua puppy@killerchihuahua.com:
Oh, I loved the "Amazon has money and will sue, and (WP) is an educational charity.." - so pleased you were able to wedge that in, David!
Yes. It stops them from pointing out they're a charity too (which they are, legally).
- d.
That may well be a charity, but they're not educational, they're repressive, which gives us very much the moral high ground here. Nicely done, for both (and probably sundry other) reasons. Not the least of which is that people occasionally give $$$$ when they hear the words "educational charity".