For example "If three people say your name is offensive, then you have to change it". Will libertarians use this to harass a socialist? Will Greens use this to harass a free market environmentalist?
Well, that's not really voting. You also have to count those who oppose the proposal, i.e. think that a name is not offensive. Which brings us to Magnus' planned consensus module again, which IMHO would be useful for this type of decision.
Regards,
Erik