On 4/19/07, Fred Bauder fredbaud@waterwiki.info wrote:
This is the best argument for not accepting articles which will receive no significant attention, either from the public or from us. We have long passed the point recent changes patrolling will catch all such vandalism.
Fred
Most cases of articles not receiving attention are due to the people who could handle it either aren't online at the time such vandalism occurs or simply don't know the article exists.
I have multiple biographies of living people on my watchlist and I can give it attention, but I can't check that list for vandalism 24/7. Anyway, I don't think cutting otherwise okay articles is the way to deal with this. That's like giving in to the vandals.
I am still waiting for Stable Versions.
Mgm