David Alexander Russell wrote:
<snip>RFC generates plenty of interest, the problem is that it has no 'teeth'
- there is nothing to stop the party who 'loses' an RFC from ignoring
its conclusions.
Cynical
I'd have to disagree - an article I placed on RfC twice, both times in two places and a spot on current surveys never received a single comment from any of those posts. And they were up for months.
RfC would have more teeth if more good editors commented on a regular basis. As it is, its hit and miss.