The arbitration committee might retain jurisdiction, or at least be able to reopen the matter in case. They could then impose a hard long ban if really necessary.
Fred
From: Daniel Ehrenberg littledanehren@yahoo.com Reply-To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:26:39 -0800 (PST) To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Creative Alternatives to Bans
Fred Bauder wrote:
Before a "short ban" would be considered the editor would have lost an arbitration dispute. How about some creative alternatives to bans as results? For example, an editor may only be having trouble in certain areas, for example, Fred Bauder, should he lose an arbitration might be forbidden from editing any philosophy articles....
Fred
Sounds good but how would you enforce that? For most people that would work, but many trolls would just ignore it without something like a threat of banning.
LDan
Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/ _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l