On 17/10/2007, Will Beback will.beback.1@gmail.com wrote:
David Gerard wrote:
Not all, but certainly those whose skin is so very sensitive that they insist that removing michaelmoore.com from [[Michael Moore]] as an "attack site" is a necessary move. You keep trying to reduce this to binary choices. Doing so has already led to blithering idiocy (e.g. on your part with removing the Making Light links). Perhaps you need to stop trying to reduce it to binary choices.
Let's not engage in uncivil language with each other while we're discussing harassment.
It's hardly "uncivil language" to note that you come to this discussion with unclean hands.
It's clear you understand that people were upset at what you did, but still don't understand *why* they were upset. If you disagree, are you able to articulate what they were upset about?
- d.