On 05/09/06, Oskar Sigvardsson oskarsigvardsson@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with this too, but there is a very easy fix for this: a disambiguation page. They work brilliantly, and the "hatnote" for them doesn't detract from it's subject at all, no matter how serious it is. No need to reform the disambiguation policy all willy-nilly to something that is less clear. It's a fine policy, it's worked great for a long time, and there are no real flaws with it. So what is the problem?
That Steve doesn't like it so is going around messing it up. No, I'm not convinced either.
- d.