And we shall all hold hands and love one another, right? You obviously have no consideration for fairness and accuracy.
I will raise this issue for as long as it takes. You can return to your apathy now.
For everyone else, take my angry diatribes seriously and verify the accusations I am making. the article with 40 citations that was speedy deleted remains here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MichaelQSchmidt/sandbox_The_unloved_articl...
Bill
________________________________ From: Tris Thomas Tris@waterhay.co.uk To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2009 4:40:53 PM Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia Forum
Earlier today I was actually relatively supportive of your issue. You, with your last few posts, have turned me against it. I won't try & stop it being put on again, but there will be no more support from my end. Firstly, this isn't an administrators mailing list, I've only been a member for a few days-my username is dottydotdot & I can still participate fully. Just because not many people have replied to your stuff about Cabal doesn't give you the right to get angry & start swearing on what was a perfectly civil mailing list. I highly doubt you will get any support from anyone on this mailing list now, people who once might have supported you.
Please don't bother to continue your diatribe.
Thank you. :-)
On 09/04/2009 21:27, Bill Carter wrote:
Wikipedia Review will make me feel right at home? You mean they'll address this issue which none of you Wikipedia administrators intend to, particularly David Gerard? What's the fucking point of you guys being administrators when you won't address important issues? Since when is it okay to speedy delete a new article re-created with the intentions of addressing all of Wikipedia's notability demands? You guys are running a reckless website and actually receive a deserved amount of negative press.
The article in question about journalist Alan Cabal: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MichaelQSchmidt/sandbox_The_unloved_articl...
Bill
From: Charles Matthewscharles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com To: English Wikipediawikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2009 4:23:02 PM Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia Forum
Bill Carter wrote:
Can you get Wikipedia Review to take up issue with the speedy deletion on March 30th, 2009 of the re-created Alan Cabal article, which was followed by a demented deletion review a day later I believe? Here's the article in question about journalist Alan Cabal: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MichaelQSchmidt/sandbox_The_unloved_articl...
It looks to me to be a fucking notable article with plenty of citations.
Mosey over there. They'll make you feel right at home.
Charles
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l