Articles are not "uncontroversially encyclopedic" when they being brought up for deletion because of their lack of encyclopedic content or nature. A taskforce improving articles that don't have an AFD nomination would be more in line with your flawed vision of what the project constitutes. But when the project extensively mentions comabting what they see as unnecessary deletions in its intro and includes a direct link to AFD, then it's not a resource for improving articles that need help the most, but a project for making sure borderline articles get kept. That's inclusioism.
On 7/13/07, Philip Sandifer snowspinner@gmail.com wrote:
I'm willing to practice euthanasia on them
I'm willing to block you for being disruptive if you delete an article on a notable topic that could have been improved just to oppose people trying to fix them.
-Phil
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l