Anthony wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Steve Summit scs@eskimo.com wrote:
I'm *glad* that it's not obvious who wrote an article. I like to think of Wikipedia as being written by some large number of anonymous contributors, one of whom happens to be me.
Thanks. I think that proves my point. Wikipedia has been taken over by altruists.
"Taken over by"? When was it ever not? I certainly don't sense any change on this score over the 3+ years I've been contributing.
It doesn't bother me that you've branded me as an altruist, although it's mildly interesting to ponder which definition of that odious term you had in mind. I can think of at least three:
1. To be altruistic, you can't get any money for what you do. 2. To be altruistic, you can't get anything in return for what you do. 3. To be altruistic, you must make significant sacrifices (it must significantly cost you) to do what you do.
I'm not interested in arguing about these, but before you go thinking I'm all number-two-altruistic for not wanting my name on articles I've contributed to, I should say that I nevertheless do get a *lot* in return -- mostly in the form of inner satisfaction. (And I know I'm far from alone in this attitude.)