On 2/23/06, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
Woah, a whole _year_? I'd thought the article was just temporarily deleted while some details got sorted out. _Now_ I've got a serious grounds for objection. What happens if the deleted article database gets purged at some point before then? And what if there are notable developments in the details of this topic over the course of the next year? We shouldn't have to be keeping notes offline for a whole year, we'll lose out on all sorts of opportunity for the organic article growth that Wikipedia excels at.
Hmm... I wonder why do we have articles like [[Alfonso X of Castile]] that happened 800 years ago?? who kept notes offline so much time?
I wonder if someone did is because he actually is, *ahem* *ahem* notable?