On 8/28/06, Matt Brown morven@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/28/06, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
A lot of that is masses of text to clog spam filters that work on word frequency, with the actual content in an image at the end.
The good thing, though, is that the more spammers try to mask what they're pushing,
a) The spam becomes easier to distinguish by human eye, and b) The spam becomes less effective, since it's a much poorer advertisement.
Very true. It's very easy to ignore an email with a horribly-misspelled subject title with one of several thousand ways of describing Viagara or erection.
(I wonder if this email will pass the spam filters?)