And by the same strong argument there is no reason to keep them there. Sure, we're not censored, but that doesn't mean we need to be stubborn when a (sort of) uncensored solution exists.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:14 PM, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 22/02/2008, Tony Sidaway tonysidaway@gmail.com wrote:
We actually have an article , "Depictions of Muhammad". Illustrations are greatly overrated in my opinion.
Why don't we just put all the illustrations into the "depictions" article, say that they're there in the other article, and get on with the rest of our lives secure in the knowledge that yet another Alexandrian immolation has been averted by the use of commonsense.
Because there is no reason to remove them from the Muhammad article.
-- geni
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l