On 1/22/06, David Gerard fun@thingy.apana.org.au wrote:
geni (geniice@gmail.com) [060121 07:05]:
Ok now it we've got it reframed so it is not such an obvious attempt to push inclusionism
Presumably this is an example of your grasp of good faith.
If the user is an inclusionist it is hardly imposible that they may propose policies that support their position. The original proposal did fairly clearly favor the inclusionist position. It is hardly ilogical to conclude that the intial proposal was in part meant to forward the inclusionist position. The regular anti deletionist sentiments expressed on this list renforces this conclusion.
There is a significant differece between AGF and stop thinking.
Anyway if you want to try and go forward with this you need to start discussing this on wikipedia as soon as posible.~~~~
wikien-l is part of the official Wikipedia infrastructure, whether you like that fact for the present discussion or not.
- d.
I fail to see the relivance for this. Recent experence suggests that for practical purposes disscusing something on wikien-I is not the same as discussing it on wikipedia.
-- geni