On 12/18/06, Steve Bennett stevagewp@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/19/06, NSLE (Wikipedia) nsle.wikipedia@gmail.com wrote:
I assume most of the list's readers know what problems we've been having with the TFA each day on the main page (vandals inserting shock images
into
transcluded-on-transcluded templates). In case some don't, I'm posting
this
to see if anyone has ideas off how to avoid this. It's been discussed extensively on ANI, and there does not seem to be a workable solution to
it.
The images are being uploaded by sleeper socks old enough to upload
them,
and protecting every single template on TFA (including transcluded-on-transcluded ones) can be tedious for the admins. I've suggested perhaps substituting the templates before they become TFA (and re-transcluding after), but do the other list readers have any solution?
Every type of vandalism goes away if we can implement a short delay before the page goes "live". Allow rollbacks/undos to be carried out on non-live versions of the page, and edits should also always be performed on the newest version.
The problem is not vandalism in itself. The problem is that our timeframe for reacting to vandalism is zero. Any act of vandalism is instantly visible to the entire world. Even a short delay of 2 minutes would drastically reduce the incentive for vandals and their impact even if successful.
Steve
That is not an in-wiki fix for the problem. While I agree that it would be useful, major modifications to MediaWiki are outside the immediate tactical scope... Unless you know PHP a lot more fluently than I do and have commit access to the source ;-)