Dammit, stupid computer. Try again:
There's not always a clear divide between original research, and using the subject as a primary source. For instance, film articles usually contain plot summaries. The plot summary is written by people who have watched the film; it is not (and normally cannot) be cited to an independent reliable source. But it is verifiable by watching the film. Similarly, nobody has published anything about this pinball machine. But the information is verifiable by looking at the machine itself. Where does taking information from a machine itself turn into original research?