I have to be allowed to answer the accuracy of what is said about me, but think it would be sterile to have the same argument here as we have had in the talk page concerned.
I'm still learning how the 3RR rule works in crisis situations, and it's actually part of Asperger Syndrome to interpret rules by logic instead of by a tribal-type social reading of its meaning. Hence, not "the letter of 3RR is just the way it is,lump it" but "does 3RR apply to the letter in a situation where it doesn't serve its intended purpose?" I kept doing revert edits because (i) the opposition were a group who could pool their 3RR rights, hence it was common sense that I couldn't be handicapped unequally as 1 person defending against them, (ii) I was reverting an arbitrary deletion they were repeating every few minutes, and they were refusing to make any attempt in talk to negotiate a consensual wording, so the right of reversion of simple vandalism logically applied. Most of my edits were not simple reverts to the past, they were consensual attempts to find new versions incorporating other users' points on the issue.
All were done properly logged in except just 1 that went through as IP accidentally and was still identifed from my edit summary, so there has never been any attempt at anonymity and what is Zachary getting at? As for the edit summariesd Ryan calls hurtful,they were my defences to the hurtfulness of the group campaign and gave an ethical case for each edit.
I have not accused anyone of hurting children, what I accused was that deletion of the item is an act against the prevention of hurting children. This is apparent from the item. I contended logically this actually made the other side of this edit war illegal.
As can be seen in talk, the edit war was started by a user called 24.19.0.114, now called ManekiNeko, who came there out of nowhere and arbitrarily posted a personal attack on my character, drawn from his own unsubstantiated prejudice that an issue he knows I care about does not matter, and from believing some lies - which he repeated - that are spread by the Aspies For Freedom site that I and many other aspies have had serious ethical problems with that are documented in other places. This user also exposed my name without consent. This was supposed to justify deleting a 1-sentence item just because it was by me: i.e. personal prejudice, and arguing that the sentence was dangerous to Wikipedia's reputation just because it was by me! The only issue around Wikipedia's reputation is that users can't treat each other like that!
The discussion on it has consisted of personal attacks ever since. The only arguments given against the item have been personal attacks or assertions that it is not important without saying why. and since whe has thinking an item not important, which another user thinks is deeply important concerning how children are treated, been a reason for making such an out-of-control fuss, not for editing it but for totally excluding any mention of it? and for a group vendetta to that effect?
Ryan has shown here too that he is letting personal dislike cause careless errors in what he says about me. I'm not a 14-year old who can't get a book published, at all! I'm 37! and was in the ''early eighties'' a victim of schoolwork pressures and long-drawn-out traumas with the school system that unfairly ruined my chance to complete writing a book at that age.
The site that Ryan and a couple of others are trying to tar as a "hate site", has on its front page a legal commitment to the right to reply for anyone commented about on it. It is in fact an anti-hate site for sticking up for personal fairness on other sites. Getting listed on it is no worse than getting listed on the blocks page here! - unless of course because you demonstrably have done something really mean you haven't got a reply. It is an issue of balance that if this site, Spectrum Fairness, is not linked to, then neither are Aspies For Freedom and its offshoot Autistic Pride Day.
Anyway, I have sent in to this section a new separate topic, Ethical Need To Reform the 3RR Rule For Even-Handedness, to make a case to the whole of Wikipedia for reform of the 3RR rule to pin it down to work 2-sidedly, as it has not in this case where all my opponents should have been given blocks on equal terms alongside me.
___________________________________________________________ How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com