On 4/16/07, Eugene van der Pijll eugene@vanderpijll.nl wrote:
Newyorkbrad (Wikipedia) schreef:
En-WP has an article called [[Suicide methods]]. [...] I do not see how the article could be maintained in an acceptable state without permanently protecting it.
[...]
it is requiring a supreme effort of willpower not to perform an immediate IAR speedy deletion of this article on the ground
that
it represents an imminent threat to human life and safety whose existence tends to place the project in disrepute.
If you feel the article is unmaintainable without protecting it, why do you propose to *delete* it? A more logical (and acceptable) choice would be to protect it.
Eugene
I was about to say the same thing. If you believe it can work in a protected status, we should try that before going through another AFD or rouge deletion.
Mgm