For me to mention that they mentioned that you've mentioned that they've mentioned what you said about what they said about wikipedia? Bear with me guys... Although, to WR's credit, all but one of the users are on wikimedia's side and they've got technical details to back up their facts, as opposed to this one 'joel'.
On 9/3/06, Daniel R. Tobias dan@tobias.name wrote:
On 2 Sep 2006 at 22:44, "Daniel R. Tobias" dan@tobias.name wrote:
I don't know why I ever bother to look at the Wikipedia Review site... the antics of the malcontents and morons there always make my blood boil. But the latest stupid accusation they're making against Wikipedia is that we're supposedly infecting people with viruses:
Now somebody on that thread has "responded" to my message here, saying that I should be ashamed of myself.
I guess it's time for them to mention that I've mentioned that they've mentioned what I've said about what they said about Wikipedia. Can we try for a few more levels of recursion?
-- == Dan == Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/ Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/ Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dan.info/
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l