On 6/18/07, Rich Holton richholton@gmail.com wrote:
jayjg wrote:
On 6/17/07, Rich Holton richholton@gmail.com wrote:
jayjg wrote:
The underlying question here is, if someone with checkuser repeatedly sees the same user editing from open proxies, is there any responsibility for the checkuser to notify the user that they are in violation of policy? Or is it acceptable to simply block the proxy and allow the user to continue? And for how long? At what point should seeing a user repeatedly violating policy provoke a response from someone with checkuser status?
I have no idea what the policy or practice is; it has certainly never been written up.
If you see via the Checkuser facility that someone is repeatedly violating NOP, do you *ever* do anything more than block the proxy? If so, what? and when?
It depends entirely upon the situation. If they're obvious vandals or the like, then I block them as well as blocking the proxy.
So, you use your judgment to make these decisions. That's valid and expected. CU status is given to those we assume to have good judgment on these sort of issues.
But it is exactly your judgment that is in question here:
You have made a logical error; just because you have questioned my judgement, it doesn't mean my judgement is in question.
Against policy? Probably not. Good judgment on your part. Absolutely not.
In your opinion.
I honestly think that you should consider resigning your CU status. Accept responsibility for your own actions. At the very minimum, you should admit an error in judgment.
That's great Rich. You know what? Some people feel the exact opposite. And some people feel that the entire atmosphere on this subject has been poisoned by some WR trolls. It's nice that the wikien-l list can accommodate such a wide spectrum of views.