At 23:10 -0400 30/9/08, Nathan wrote:
If you're not understanding the point, I'll simplify it - BLPs are important because of the impact they can have, as demonstrated by this guy and his article and the effect it nearly had on his career.
Yes, since it aggregated and hence aggravated the reports of his behaviour.
To answer your question - probably not, no. If there is a two page article about someone in the Times, and midway through page 2 it says that he inherited his brown eyes from his father, that is an example of a fact found in a reliable source that does not belong in the article. Salaciousness isn't the standard for inclusion of a detail in an encyclopedic entry.
Nathan
Indeed,
Gordo