steven l. rubenstein said:
This brings us back to an issue I and others have raised: we have mechanisms for resolving disputes over behavior; we do not have, but need, mechanisms for resolving disputes over content.
Well we do have some. As a non-exhaustive list: talk pages, RfC (section on Article content disputes), Wikipedia:Peer review, surveys, Village Pump, page protection as a means of making disputants iron out their differences. And we have policies and guidelines to tell us what to aim for. Beware instruction creep.