Spectator-quality material? I presume you're being ironic!
----- Original Message ----- From: "David Gerard" dgerard@gmail.com To: "English Wikipedia" wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Friday, 17 April, 2009 00:10:00 GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, Portugal Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Rod Liddle, Spectator, on his Wikipedia article
2009/4/17 Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com:
I think our best chances are to use the media to fight this, not the police/courts. We should issue a statement saying he's lying through his teeth, if that is the case, or that his actions are seriously inappropriate, if he did make the edits. There are people in the media that are on our side, we should be able to get something published.
I wouldn't issue a statement. You might however wish to write to his editor, documenting the evidence, and suggesting that his fictional piece is not up to scratch as Spectator-quality material.
- d.
_______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l